Pr0n on the Couch

Yes, I saw the slide of the presentation CouchDB: Perform like a Pr0n Star. It's sparked a raging debate all over the internet that's taken a life of it's own. I'm getting some testy emails. So I think I should say something, lest some people interpret my silence as approval.

Now, I don't know what it was like to be there in attendance, but what I saw I was not offensive to me (as if!). I thought it was kind of humorous. But how I felt is besides the point.

Was it sexist? Not in my opinion. Sexual themes aren't necessarily sexist, and I didn't see anything to support a notion of women being less suitable for development or other tech work. Reasonable people can differ here, but I don't see sexism in this talk.

But was the talk inappropriate? In my opinion, yes. I wouldn't give a talk like that, and I would discourage colleagues from giving talks like that at a developer conference.

Some people in attendance were, if not offended, at least made to feel uncomfortable. I can imagine there are conferences where it's just fine, even encouraged, to push the limits of polite behavior. Heck, sounds like a fun conference, can I go too?

But at a developer conference, that's not a good thing. Most everyone at conferences are strangers to one another, and developers aren't known to be the most outgoing people. Anything that makes people feel uncomfortable is going to shut down communication and openness. Even if those who are uncomfortable skipped the talk, others didn't and no doubt will be gabbing about it afterward. There can be no doubt that sexual themes absolutely will make some people feel uncomfortable and close them off. Not just women, some men also feel really uncomfortable about this stuff, but are less likely to admit it.

Now, I'm not against making people feel uncomfortable (sometimes I even like it). There are a lot of very important issues that people feel uneasy discussing, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't discuss it. I remember as a kid watching C. Everett Coop talk about condoms and intercourse during the AIDs/HIV crisis. Lots of people got wound up about that. But he absolutely had to, the cost of people's discomfort was nothing compared to their ignorance.

But in this case, the cost of people's discomfort was outweighed by nothing. It was simply unnecessary, and therefore inappropriate. Not wildly, dangerously, or seriously inappropriate. Just your garden variety inappropriateness.

Now, the reason I'm writing this is not to express my disapproval or outrage on this talk. Honestly I don't feel that strongly about this talk, and I'm a little surprised it's such a big issue. But there can be no doubt it is a big issue and lots of people are talking about it.

The real reason I'm writing this is I don't want to see a misinterpretation of CouchDB culture, or worse a trend of being so cool we don't need politeness and decorum. We shouldn't be that way, we are an inclusive community and CouchDB is a progressive technology, not a cultural movement. If we piss people off it should be because our technology is disruptive, not our community.

Posted April 29, 2009 10:56 AM

Comments

This is very well put:

If we piss people off, it should be because our technology is disruptive, not our community.

Regardless of how people feel about the content of the slides it was clear before he presented that it would discourage participation from some percentage of people and encourage additional participation from absolutely nobody and if you're trying to build a better open source community you should be trying increase participation in every way that you can.

Great post.

mikeal, April 29, 2009 2:47 PM

discomfort people? mah - you US guys are strange. the presentation seems a little bit childish, but if such content discomforts you, it may be better to lock yourself into your room and only watch pre-censored content on TV (but take care, that you're not accidentally watching any foreign channels without strict censorship).

me, April 29, 2009 3:06 PM

I had not seen that presentation until now.

That is funny, memorable.

Carl Tyler, April 29, 2009 3:24 PM

Very nicely put. Less egotism, more code.

Scott Markwell, April 29, 2009 4:19 PM

The only slide I would cut from it is number 53 with the ACID drugs reference.

Alan Bell, April 29, 2009 4:23 PM

Any given night watching TV, I could easily see all of those images on any major network. I think if anything this images in the presentation posed more as an inappropriate ice breaker. Breaking the ice amongst strangers can be a good thing. Is it the right way to break the ice? Depends. I think the whole conversation is ridiculous and way too politically correct for me so I will stop talking about it now.

Sean, April 29, 2009 5:38 PM

Having seen the slides I think the presenter should feel ashamed that he used a sexual theme to talk about such a groundbreaking technology. Had the presenter not used such a theme the talk would've delivered a strong message about what CouchDB can do.

I believe that the CouchDB community is open and welcoming (having had first-hand experience chatting with you guys on #couchdb) and this will prevail over a set of ill-thought-out slides.

Luke Venediger, April 29, 2009 5:50 PM

@Alan Bell: how can you be okay with the sex references and not the drugs reference? talk about hypocritical. anyway...

FACT: porn is degrading to women. therefore, associate something that women love with porn and women will have a problem with it, in one shape or another. no surprise there.

personally, I probably would not have read a presentation about CouchDB if it weren't structured so provocatively. here's hoping the project is a success, it looks like a step in the right direction.

dave, April 29, 2009 6:18 PM

A single image of a happy black person singing and dancing isn't offensive. In fact, you can probably see happy black people singing and dancing on network TV. When you theme your whole presentation around happy black people singing and dancing, though, then you've crossed a line.

Maybe you're not a bad person. Maybe you're ignorant of the relevant cultural and historical context and the nerves that those images would touch. Maybe it really was a good theme for your material in a justifiable way. In that case, you apologize, recognize you did something wrong, and everyone learns not to do it again.

So why isn't that what's happening now?

robo, April 29, 2009 6:43 PM

I do hope it doesn't tarnish the image of CouchDB. From everything i've heard, the rage is entirely directed at the Rails community - mostly at the Rails core team. I don't think anyone has anything bad to say about CouchDB or the Ruby community.

aimee.mychores.co.uk, April 29, 2009 7:00 PM

People are upset about this? Really??

While a few images pulled attention from the content of the slide, I bet no one was bored watching him give the presentation.

Surprisingly some of the core concepts and strengths were communicated surprisingly well using the sexual metaphors and I got a few chuckles out of the presentation.

Lighten up folks its just sex and humor. Not racism, hate, rainmaking or fear mongering.

Though, I sense Godwin's law about to kick in...

Lon, April 29, 2009 7:01 PM

don't worry katz, pythonist don't hate couchdb but ruby. they keep inventing stupid (like this) arguments against ruby and its community.

I would NOT call this porn, do you?

patricio, April 29, 2009 7:51 PM

I don't know, CouchDB is interesting in and of itself. The technology is interesting. The potential applications are interesting. The back store with Lotus Notes and Damian's time off from work is interesting.

Why would you need to sex any of that up to make your presentation interesting? Is your audience that bereft of curiosity?

peter, April 29, 2009 8:42 PM

At least you didn't name the product something like "groovy"

Rob, April 29, 2009 9:26 PM

@dave, how is that hypocritical? The presentation was clearly listed as having a porn (or pr0n) theme, not a drugs theme. I am really trying to find an inconsistency in my thinking but I can't.

Alan Bell, April 30, 2009 1:30 AM

I though it would of been better if it had a couchDb theme.

While I've seen worse, that presentation would still be classified as NSFW. Which is who you as a techie would be selling it to.

Simon, April 30, 2009 2:07 AM

FWIW: My girlfriend loved these slides and thought they were funny. They actually got her to look at what CouchDB is about. She is a computer science PhD student and although CouchDB is probably not of interest to her, she now has an idea of what this CouchDB thing is that I've been rambling about for the last few weeks.

breun, April 30, 2009 3:14 AM

AFAICS eventually it's all down to political correctness and useless clichés
"porn degrading to women"? how exactly? this gay porn feature and that dominatrix with a big strapon and a helpless male at his knees and all those swinger orgies - how are they degrading to females?
"women hate porn"? wrong, some people like it and some people hate it and most are conditioned by their environment beyond recognition
"drugs unmentionable"? well, if everyone knows what ACID refers to, and everyone knows what acid tab on the tongue refers to, why can't the pun be made?
"offensive"? well, I turn on TV and I am offended right there - by all that god talk, by all that all-people-equal talk, by all that conditioning bullshit that's broadcast every hour and every minute
every human being is different and anything that takes one of them for a second out of the fucking loop is good
I couldn't attend the talk but the slides are funny, inventive, and out of the loop just a bit
good thing

hotgiraffe, April 30, 2009 4:52 AM

wow same breun opinion,
I asked to my girlfriend to look at this presentation, she loved it. - "the pics are the less important thing here", she said.

thanks to matteti's effort, many people know about couchdb now!

if you think this is "porn" please don't see real porn - you could die.

retarded, April 30, 2009 12:12 PM

Breun's girlfriend here. Interesting thread, just wanted to add some things from a woman's perspective :)

Dave said: "FACT: porn is degrading to women. therefore, associate something that women love with porn and women will have a problem with it, in one shape or another. no surprise there."

First of all, porn is not degrading to women. Maybe the kind of porn YOU watch is ;) but no, porn is not by definition degrading to women. I even dare say that most women love (some kinds of) pr0n. And as breun pointed out, I actually loved the slides and found them very funny.

Also, I'm curious how many of the guys here dislike the presentation because they find it personally offensive vs. how many dislike it because they think it is offensive to women. I think you might be pleasantly surprised at how many women don't find the presentation (or actual pr0n, for that matter) offensive. We're not all prudish little princesses, you know ;)

nieske, May 1, 2009 7:35 AM

P.S. I just read the "raging debate" that is linked in the article and apparently have to retract my statement that the presentation (or any use of porn as a metaphor for stuff) isn't offensive to a lot of women. Oh well, maybe I just have weird friends :)

nieske, May 1, 2009 7:52 AM

Ha ha, "testy".

Ronnie, May 3, 2009 8:23 PM

It seems to me the problem most people have was not the images themselves but the response from the presenter which was basically "boo hoo. go cry in a corner, you baby."

Mackenzie, May 3, 2009 8:36 PM

Your girlfriend is fine with it? Cool! What's her phone number?

Hottie, May 7, 2009 3:53 AM

It seems the issue runs deeper in the Ruby community than just these slides...or so says Tim Bray and Martin Fowler:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2009/04/30/Unhappy-Ruby
http://martinfowler.com/bliki/SmutOnRails.html

Benjamin, May 14, 2009 9:32 AM

Thanks for posting this Damien. I didn't even know about the presentation, but being female and in IT, I first thought, what's the fuss, the title was catchy and funny; but once I saw the actual presentation slides I thought it was in very, very poor taste. I would have walked out. And really, that's the bottom line, especially since this conference was crowded with mostly guys. It's perhaps the type of thing (the "size" "performance" analogies now) you'll joke about when you hang out with your guy buddies in the gents and have a nice chuckle, but there are lines of respect that were just ignored. And to continue with the theme throughout the presentation seems very odd, very childish almost. Perhaps the presenter needs to make up for something.

Adi, June 10, 2009 3:10 AM


Personally, I probably would have not read a presentation about CouchDB, when not structured so provocatively. Here is hoping the project will be a success, it looks like a step in the right direction.

Dorris Stellenangebote, June 23, 2009 8:08 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)